Becton, Dickinson and Company

Stocks

VS

Philip Morris International Inc

Stocks

Becton, Dickinson and Company vs Philip Morris International Inc: A Price-Focused Stock Comparison

Last updated: June 6, 2026

Summary

This detailed comparison examines the stock prices, valuation metrics, and profitability of Becton, Dickinson and Company and Philip Morris International Inc. With a focus on price-related aspects, it reveals how each company's market valuation, PE ratios, and dividend yields influence investment decisions in the healthcare and tobacco sectors.

Key Differences at a Glance

AspectBecton, Dickinson and CompanyPhilip Morris International IncWinner
Current stock price151.16 USD178.29 USDPhilip Morris International Inc
PE ratio (Price-to-Earnings ratio)26.3825.11Tie
Market capitalization41.65 billion USD277.88 billion USDPhilip Morris International Inc
Dividend yield2.78%3.3%Philip Morris International Inc
Forward PE ratio11.2819.52Becton, Dickinson and Company

Current stock price: Philip Morris International's stock price of 178.29 USD is approximately 17.8% higher than Becton, Dickinson's price of 151.16 USD, indicating a higher valuation in the current market.

PE ratio (Price-to-Earnings ratio): Both companies have similar PE ratios, with Becton, Dickinson at 26.38 and Philip Morris at 25.11, suggesting comparable valuation multiples relative to earnings.

Market capitalization: Philip Morris's market cap of approximately 278 billion USD vastly exceeds Becton, Dickinson's 41.65 billion USD, reflecting its larger scale and market presence.

Dividend yield: Philip Morris offers a higher dividend yield of 3.3%, making it more attractive for income-focused investors seeking consistent dividend returns.

Forward PE ratio: Becton, Dickinson's lower forward PE ratio of 11.28 indicates a more attractive valuation based on expected future earnings compared to Philip Morris's 19.52, appealing to growth-focused investors.

Detailed Analysis

Becton, Dickinson and Company (BDX) is currently priced at 151.16 USD per share, which is lower than Philip Morris International's (PM) stock price of 178.29 USD. Despite the higher absolute price, BDX's valuation appears more attractive when considering forward earnings, with a forward PE of 11.28 compared to PM’s 19.52. This suggests that BDX is potentially undervalued relative to its anticipated earnings, making it appealing for investors seeking growth at a reasonable price.

In terms of valuation multiples, both companies have similar PE ratios—26.38 for BDX and 25.11 for PM—indicating comparable market expectations relative to earnings. However, the vast difference in market capitalization, with Philip Morris at approximately $278 billion versus Becton Dickinson's $41.65 billion, underscores PM's dominance and larger scale, which can influence liquidity, stability, and dividend sustainability.

Dividend yields further differentiate these stocks from a value perspective. Philip Morris’s dividend yield of 3.3% surpasses BDX's 2.78%, making PM more attractive for income investors. Both companies have strong profit margins—27% for Philip Morris and 5% for BDX—reflecting their respective industry profitability. Notably, Philip Morris's higher profit margin of 0.26742 signifies better operational efficiency, which can justify its higher stock price.

The beta values show both stocks are less volatile than the broader market, with BDX at 0.278 and PM at 0.408. This stability can be attractive for conservative investors. The differences in forward PE ratios also reveal divergent valuation strategies: BDX's lower ratio suggests a focus on growth potential, while PM’s higher ratio indicates premium valuation based on current market sentiment.

Overall, from a price-focused perspective, Philip Morris International is valued higher both in absolute terms and relative to its earnings, driven by its larger market cap and higher dividend yield. However, Becton, Dickinson’s lower forward PE and price point make it an attractive option for value investors seeking growth potential without overpaying at current prices.

Verdict

Philip Morris International emerges as the clear price-based winner due to its higher stock price, larger market cap, and superior dividend yield, making it more attractive for income and size-focused investors. Conversely, Becton, Dickinson offers a more compelling valuation based on forward PE ratios and lower absolute price, appealing to growth investors seeking undervalued healthcare stocks. The choice depends on whether investors prioritize market size and income or growth potential and valuation efficiency.

Who Should Choose What

Choose Becton, Dickinson and Company if...

Best for investors seeking growth potential, undervalued healthcare stocks, and lower volatility, especially those interested in the medical instruments sector.

Choose Philip Morris International Inc if...

Best for income-focused investors, those prioritizing large-cap stability, and individuals seeking exposure to the tobacco industry with higher dividend yields.

Learn More

Related Comparisons